<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Two_treatises_of_government on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/two_treatises_of_government/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Two_treatises_of_government on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/two_treatises_of_government/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Two Treatises of Government</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/two-treatises-of-government/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:28:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/two-treatises-of-government/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Summary&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Locke&amp;rsquo;s two most famous political essays are collected here. In the first, he debates the leading theory of monarchical legitimacy. In the second, he casts his own vision of what political legitimacy looks like.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;First Treatise&lt;/strong&gt; (against hereditary monarchy)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Locke&amp;rsquo;s first treatise is in response to a popular book written by Robert Filmer titled &lt;em&gt;Patriarcha&lt;/em&gt; which provides arguments supporting the divine rights of kings. As a modern reader, it is hard not to hear the arguments put forward by Filmer as anything other than attempts to fabricate defenses for an existing system of governance. The basic line of reasoning goes something like God granted Adam dominion over all the world and as such created the blueprint for how governments should be structured. There is then some confused argumentation about how children are born under the dominion of their parents and the way dominion is inherited like property to the first born. In Filmer&amp;rsquo;s defense, I am hearing these arguments from Locke who clearly thinks they are even more confused than me. Reading argumentation about something that society has largely moved past is not very interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
