<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Thought_control on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/thought_control/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Thought_control on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/thought_control/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>1984</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/1984/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:32:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/1984/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Finished this book UNABRIDGED, double plus good. Hated how believable it was. This should be required reading. The main new idea I got this time through was that the party doctrine sounded a little bit like biocentrism. They had just swapped the party for consciousness.  Biocentrism says reality exists only by conscious observation. Winston said reality only has true existence by the party&amp;rsquo;s doctrine. He who owns the present owns the past. Winston&amp;rsquo;s point about immortality through the party is also the same point that people have made about the &amp;ldquo;I&amp;rdquo; continuing to exist through the other &amp;ldquo;I&amp;quot;s that succeed it. In Winston&amp;rsquo;s case he believed he was immortal because the party would never die. I think this is a great insight by Orwell, because it would seem that it is impossible to set up a society without bringing along metaphysical baggage. The desire (need?) for metaphysics is like a sexuality that if repressed just comes through the cracks in very disturbing ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
