<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Social_order on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/social_order/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Social_order on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/social_order/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Mythologies</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/mythologies/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:32:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/mythologies/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;At times illuminating, frustrating, thought provoking, unrelatable Roland Barthes has a different understanding of what myth is than most. He feels as if no one is intentionally creating myths anymore but they are being creating all the same via social values. This book is broken into two parts the first part is a collection of essays he wrote where he analyses various events and things in the modern day and explains the modern myth that is attached to them. This branch of study is I guess called semiology, basically it looks at things in the world and looks for things that carry more meaning than their essence. For example, he breaks down different portraits styles of French politicians to explain why they were cropped just so, looked in such and such a direction, wore just such a suit etc. etc. etc. All choices deliberately made to communicate more than just happenstance random choice but instead a specific meaning. He saw myth as an organizational tool used to maintain and justify a given social order. As indicated in this quote:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
