<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Slaying_giants on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/slaying_giants/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Slaying_giants on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/slaying_giants/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Inspired</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/inspired-slaying-giants-walking-on-water-and-loving-the-bible-again/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/inspired-slaying-giants-walking-on-water-and-loving-the-bible-again/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Rachel Evans has done all the research on the bible that you probably meant to do but never got around to. Like researching the canonization of the Bible, comparing different types of those canonizations. Researching the similarities to other older religions and the Bible generally trying to figure out what its deal is and why people still give a fluff about it. The author comes from a similar-ish background to what I did, but since she is a woman the things that made her start questioning the stories she was told were different than the ones that caused me to question. Her&amp;rsquo;s I would guess started with the treatment of women in the Bible. So, she tries her best, like we all do to honestly question what we are supposed to do with the &amp;ldquo;good book&amp;rdquo; in the year of our lord 2020. She has some interesting insights and gives me plenty to think about. It is always really weird to me to hear from someone who has such a completely new translation of what the bible means to them as opposed to what we were raised in. When you hear the same thing in the same way for so many hours you get the idea that there is only one way to read something. And even though you know that is not true you don&amp;rsquo;t know how else to read it.
At any rate this is a decent book. It seems pretty fairly written with manageable biases here and there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
