<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Scientific_materialism on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/scientific_materialism/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Scientific_materialism on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/scientific_materialism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>From Bacteria to Bach and Back</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/from-bacteria-to-bach-and-back-the-evolution-of-minds/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/from-bacteria-to-bach-and-back-the-evolution-of-minds/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I listened to this whole book, then went back and listened to the first half again, to try and cement an understanding of his argument which could be fairly complicated. The goal of the book was to give a convincing explanation of Scientific Materialism. So instead of &amp;ldquo;A Case for Christ&amp;rdquo; this would be &amp;ldquo;A Case for Darwin&amp;rdquo;. It was pretty nice to hear the best arguments for materialism from a guy who has spent much of his life studying the problem, but it took extra concentration to keep up as the reasoning was so different from the usual hippy pan psychic stuff I&amp;rsquo;ve been reading of late. Here are some thoughts,&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
