<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sattva on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/sattva/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Sattva on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/sattva/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Bhagavad Gita</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-bhagavad-gita-a-walkthrough-for-westerners/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-bhagavad-gita-a-walkthrough-for-westerners/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I first listened to the Bhagavad-Gita in its entirety. I found it somewhat interesting but ultimately a dud because it felt like every other word was either a Sanskrit deity that i was supposed to already know about or a Sanskrit word that represented an entire doctrine like the word &amp;ldquo;transubstantiation&amp;rdquo;. It felt like watching marvel&amp;rsquo;s avengers end game with a Spanish voice over without any context. Probably similar feeling to someone who has never read the bible reading a book like Hebrews or something. That being said there were some interesting things in there that made me want to dig a little further. I then washed down the Bhagavad-Gita with a book by Jack Hawley. He basically walks through every verse in the Gita and translates it into more modern western terms, adding a couple clarifying sentences to those pesky single word Sanskrit ideas. The idea that was most novel to me in the Gita was that Krishna and also (luckily) other Hindu philosophies break people and actions into 3 categories. Sattva, Rajas, and Tamas. Sattva being the highest representing balance, harmony and goodness. Rajas representing energy and motion and Tamas representing lethargy and darkness. The idea being that each person and action has all three of these present at all times but in differing proportions. This was an interesting choice and makes for a more dynamic categorization of actions than the dichotomies of the west. I will have to think more about this in the future. Another question this book brought up for me was wondering why the particular virtues of &amp;ldquo;Grace, gentleness, self-control, and humility&amp;rdquo; to name a few appear to be somewhat universal in religions?  The Gita did overlap a lot with ideas of the New Testament. One of the biggest differences I recognized was that Krishna did not call for evangelizing his ideas. All in all, worth the read and has opened up new frontiers to think over. Also don&amp;rsquo;t let your wives become corrupted or they will ruin this whole caste system we have set up. That is all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
