<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Satire on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/satire/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Satire on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/satire/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Heart of a Dog</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/heart-of-a-dog/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:32:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/heart-of-a-dog/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is one of those books where revealing anything is too much. The book opens from the perspective of a scruffy stray dog who encounters a mysterious Dr. Filipp Filippovich. Things get out of hand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thoughts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I enjoyed this book. From the author of The Master and Margarita, which I read almost exactly a year ago, Bulgakov offers another incisive satirical take on the Bolshevik Revolution. The book presents a dual critique: on one hand, it addresses the hubris of the revolutionaries, who are overly confident in their understanding of human nature. On the other hand, it highlights that people are indeed different; some are worth listening to, while others should be ignored. This book provides a literary vision of an unfortunately successful bourgeois (which I don&amp;rsquo;t feel a part of until I can spell the word without looking it up)  social architect and portrays an exaggerated, unwashed proletariat wielding newfound power. Beyond any political interpretations, the book is fairly short and entertaining for the most part. The writing is unsurprisingly quiet good and makes for a perfect Halloween season read from the USSR. Onward comrades!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Candide and Zadig</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/candide-and-zadig/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:29:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/candide-and-zadig/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Candide&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have you ever been so maddened by a single sentence that you decided to write a book? Leibniz is famous for his claim that we live in &amp;ldquo;the best of all possible worlds&amp;rdquo;, after the Lisbon earthquake which killed somewhere between 12,000 to 50,000 people Voltaire rejected this claim. In large part this book is a parody of this optimism. Candide the main character grows up in a sheltered privileged life where his tutor Pangloss teaches him that he lives in the best of all possible worlds. After a series of events our naïve hero is kicked out into the real world and is almost immediately kidnapped by Bulgarians and pressed into service. Leading to one of my favorite scenes where in Voltaire&amp;rsquo;s dark comedic tone is captured.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dead Souls</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/dead-souls/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:30:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/dead-souls/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Gogol is one more of those Russian authors (actually born in Ukraine) that was an inspiration to many other authors (Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy, Kafka, etic) I thought it was about time to take the old boy out himself. Dead Souls follows a mysterious character that the reader gets to know as the book unfolds who just as mysteriously wants to buy dead serfs from Russian aristocrats. The writing style was easy to digest, and the book is filled with many charming and ridiculous characters. This book was somewhat unique as the author would break the fourth wall from time to time and give his own views about things. Full of insightful social commentary and awkward predicaments the book was called the Russian Pickwick Papers, but I wouldn&amp;rsquo;t go that far, I would say this book is a lot less ridiculous and more surreal, which I would guess is why it appealed to Kafka. The book surprisingly ends in mid-sentence leaving scholars to argue whether or not it was supposed to be that way. Whether it was or not it definitely felt like the rug was pulled from under you. Gogol was another one of those Russian authors that seemed to live like a character from his books. A complete chad that wanted to teach Cossack history but instead was offered a job teaching Medieval History at the university of St. Petersburg a subject of which he had no qualifications.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gargantua and Pantagruel</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/gargantua-and-pantagruel/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:25:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/gargantua-and-pantagruel/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I did this so you wouldn&amp;rsquo;t have to, and now you can at least take one book off your list. Gargantua and Pantagruel was written by François Rabelais in the 1500s. While the term &amp;ldquo;renaissance man&amp;rdquo; is often over-used it really applies to Rabelais. He was a genius walking contradiction. A Frenchman, a Greek scholar, a learned physician, a monk, a humanist, and is best known for his risqué satirical songs and writing.  Whatever box you try to put him in, he seems to pop out of it. His characters have a love for life that flies in the face of the reserved stoicism that we generally associate with the 1500s. Whether it is taking a piss or reading Apollodorus each is treated equally in this book. Appearing in 5 books, the reader follows the adventures of Gargantua who is a giant, and his son Pantagruel who is also a giant. The book is filled to the brim with sex jokes and bathroom humor. Here is my favorite of each, for bathroom humor Gargantua is talking to his father about all the different objects he has used for toilet paper in his search for the perfect wiping sensation. The list includes but is not limited to old hats, slippers and velvet gloves. But his favorite is&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Double</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-double/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:30:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-double/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Double is Dostoyevsky&amp;rsquo;s second published work and is a definite precursor to much of his later work. Following the life of a low-level bureaucrat named Golyadkin for a couple chaotic days. Golyadkin is a weak and flakey person with crippling anxiety and bordering on psychotic. After attending a party and committing some embarrassing party fouls he is thrown out into the snowy night in St. Petersburg. It is in this state that Golyadkin literally bumps into his double a person that looks just like him and even shares his name. The rest of the book follows the relationship of these two characters as the double is the inverse of the real Golyadkin and has everything the original lacks. This book was also adapted into a movie with Jesse Eisenburg who is a great match for this character. The style is very surreal and also satirical it is much different from anything else I&amp;rsquo;ve read from Dostoyevsky. It was also the worst book I&amp;rsquo;ve read from him, in fact I think he says it best&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
