<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sapiens on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/sapiens/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Sapiens on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/sapiens/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Sapiens</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/sapiens-a-brief-history-of-humankind/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/sapiens-a-brief-history-of-humankind/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This was a sort of rando pick I made but was definitely the best book I&amp;rsquo;ve read this year. There is a well-known guy in the computer science community who coined this idea that code quality can be judged by the &amp;ldquo;number of WTFs/minute&amp;rdquo; the person coming behind that code has. Well, I&amp;rsquo;d like to say that when it comes to a book like this, the quality of it can be judged by how many times your mind gets blown by a unique thought or viewpoint that I haven&amp;rsquo;t had. This book has hundreds of those. In a nutshell this book outlines science&amp;rsquo;s best &amp;ldquo;story&amp;rdquo; about the development of man in the following stages&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
