<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Rick_atkinson on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/rick_atkinson/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Rick_atkinson on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/rick_atkinson/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Guns at Last Light</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-guns-at-last-light-the-war-in-western-europe-1944-1945-world-war-ii-liberation-trilogy-3/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-guns-at-last-light-the-war-in-western-europe-1944-1945-world-war-ii-liberation-trilogy-3/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The final installation in Atkinson&amp;rsquo;s WW2 trilogy, which follows the allies from D-day to V-day from 1944-45 in the European theater.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thoughts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Leading up to D-day there was a lot of uncertainty in the outcome of the war, but with the success of D-day allied victory over Germany seemed like a given, it was only a matter of time. This reminds me of playing the game Age of Empires, ( which is a real time strategy game where players control an empire and try to destroy the other players&amp;rsquo; empires)  there comes a point in the game where the balance falls so far to one side that, outside of miraculous intervention, the outcome is decided, from here on out it is up to the losers to decide how long to prolong the fight before surrendering. This was essentially the Axis&amp;rsquo; position post D-day, Hitler just refused to give up and intended on doing everything in his power to make a miracle happen. This caused the war to drag on for nearly another year incurring another two hundred thousand casualties in the already battered German army. On top of that you had the absolutely brutal allied bombings that laid to waste many of Germany&amp;rsquo;s large cities inflicting another estimated five hundred thousand civilian casualties. This feeling of how unnecessary this conflict was tinged the book for me, it wasn&amp;rsquo;t as &amp;rsquo;enjoyable&amp;rsquo; as the other books because nothing seemed in to hang in the balance anymore, but still you had to watch people die anyway for a decision that had already been made. The single most important lesson I took from this book was never underestimate the power of production and logistics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Day of Battle</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-day-of-battle-the-war-in-sicily-and-italy-1943-1944-world-war-ii-liberation-trilogy-2/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-day-of-battle-the-war-in-sicily-and-italy-1943-1944-world-war-ii-liberation-trilogy-2/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Army at Dawn documents the United States entry into the fight against Germany in North Africa. This picks up after the allies seized the critical port town of Tunis. This allied victory opened the possibility of attacking in the words of Churchill &amp;ldquo;the Axis&amp;rsquo; underbelly&amp;rdquo; in Italy. Crossing from Tunis to Sicily (the island attached to the toe of the Italy&amp;rsquo;s boot) the allies began their slow march towards Rome. During and after the capture (or liberation if you prefer) of Tunisia there was a great deal of disagreement between the British and the US over what the next target of attack should be. The Americans favored a cross channel invasion jumping from England to France, but on the other hand, after the Dunkirk debacle the Brits were much keener on the idea of invading Italy. So in a compromise they decided to do both, but since the allied troops were already stationed near Italy it was decided that the cross-channel invasion would occur a year later to allow for planning and logistical difficulties to be sorted out. In the meantime, the allies would use their deployed units to invade Italy and try to take some pressure off of Russia. It sounds good on paper, but as the casualties mounted and progress crawled to a halt in the inhospitable Italian mountain winter, victory was far from certain.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
