<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Revolution on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/revolution/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Revolution on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/revolution/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Heart of a Dog</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/heart-of-a-dog/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:32:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/heart-of-a-dog/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is one of those books where revealing anything is too much. The book opens from the perspective of a scruffy stray dog who encounters a mysterious Dr. Filipp Filippovich. Things get out of hand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thoughts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I enjoyed this book. From the author of The Master and Margarita, which I read almost exactly a year ago, Bulgakov offers another incisive satirical take on the Bolshevik Revolution. The book presents a dual critique: on one hand, it addresses the hubris of the revolutionaries, who are overly confident in their understanding of human nature. On the other hand, it highlights that people are indeed different; some are worth listening to, while others should be ignored. This book provides a literary vision of an unfortunately successful bourgeois (which I don&amp;rsquo;t feel a part of until I can spell the word without looking it up)  social architect and portrays an exaggerated, unwashed proletariat wielding newfound power. Beyond any political interpretations, the book is fairly short and entertaining for the most part. The writing is unsurprisingly quiet good and makes for a perfect Halloween season read from the USSR. Onward comrades!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Demons</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/demons/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:31:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/demons/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We were silent again for a minute.
“Cher,” he concluded at last, getting up quickly, “do you know this is bound to end in something?”
“Of course,” said I.
“Vous ne comprenez pas. Passons. But … usually in our world things come to nothing, but this will end in something; it’s bound to, it’s bound to!”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dostoyevsky chose as the epigraph to this story the passage of Luke where Jesus sends the demons into the swine, and they subsequently throw themselves off a cliff. A curious passage, and one that will come up over and over in this book. I won&amp;rsquo;t bother to write a plot summary because spoilers, and also like all of Dostoyevsky&amp;rsquo;s books, the plot is the tortilla of the burrito. It serves mainly to deliver the contents of the book. The contents are the conversations. The characters are unforgettable, you have a fifty-year-old child, who was influential once, but is of no practical use and literally runs away from home. You have Stavrogin, a man who can&amp;rsquo;t bring himself to believe in anything, but apparently can&amp;rsquo;t stop influencing people with the force of his ideas. You have the power-hungry revolutionary sociopath Pyotr Stepanovich who is always willing to break a few eggs to make an omelet. Last but not least, one of the most compelling characters Kirillov, the atheists par excellence, consumed by an idea, courageous, selfless, and ultimately doomed.  In short, this work is a literary masterpiece that managed to divine the future of Russia with astonishing clarity.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In the Time of the Butterflies</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/in-the-time-of-the-butterflies/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/in-the-time-of-the-butterflies/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A fictional account of the three (+1 wallflower sister) Mirabal sisters and their role in the revolution in attempting to overthrow the Trujillo dictatorship of the Dominican Republic. The sisters are eventually assassinated indirectly by Trujillo, this appears to have paved the way for his own assassination six months later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thoughts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While I appreciate the engaging narrative presented by Julia Alvarez, I feel conflicted in providing a comprehensive review of this book, as I initially believed it to be more historical than fictional. The unique format—each chapter narrated by one of the four sisters—may take some getting used to, with many passages resembling journal entries. In her afterword, Alvarez explains her decision to rely on the essence of the sisters&amp;rsquo; lives rather than conducting in-depth interviews or research, drawing from her father&amp;rsquo;s involvement in the anti-Trujillo underground network as justification for this approach.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
