<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Plato on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/plato/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Plato on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/plato/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Phaedrus (Hackett Classics)</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/phaedrus/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/phaedrus/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When I bought the Symposium, it came in a two pack with Phaedrus as its second. I was glad to find out that this book too revolved around pederasty(sarcasm). Essentially, Phaedrus runs into Socrates walking in the country after hearing a speech by Lysias on reasons why a boy should only lend his favors to a lover (older man) who is not in love with him. The text is lighthearted and has many jokes as Socrates then makes a better speech which agrees with Lysias impressing Phaedrus, but eventually reveals he believed Lysias&amp;rsquo; speech to be pretty lame and he didn&amp;rsquo;t agree with his own. The book finishes with him giving a rebuttal speech and then he focuses on the art of rhetoric and the dangers and pitfalls that are in it. My favorite quote is in regard to (ironically) writing:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Symposium</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-symposium/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-symposium/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I put this on the list because I had heard that in this book there was a conversation between Socrates and Diotima about love. The book is set where a group of friends get together and throw a party for a friend that had won an award for a play that he had written. At this party they all decide that they should go around in a circle and give a speech praising the god Eros (God of love). So, they go around in a circle and each character gives their speeches. On the whole speeches were mostly unenlightening although they raised very interesting realizations about homosexual relationships between older men and younger &amp;ldquo;boys&amp;rdquo; (re: modern authors believe that they were all over the age of 18 of course &lt;em&gt;crossed fingers&lt;/em&gt;). This side of the story I did not expect. Yet another time when history sneaks up on you from &amp;ldquo;behind&amp;rdquo;. One of the speeches contained a story about how in the beginning hermaphrodites were running around doing crazy stuff and the gods got mad and split them in half to make male and female. As a result, men and women roam the earth in search of their &amp;ldquo;other half&amp;rdquo;. Socrates&amp;rsquo; speech was pretty interesting. i.e., Plato) makes the argument that love happens in stages. One first learns to love details about a specific person. Then realizes that these details exist in many people. They then begin to love many people. Then they begin to love the details in and of themselves abstracted from people. In this final stage if they are lucky, they will get a glimpse of beauty (the thing which they have desired all along) un-encumbered by humanity&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fleshiness&amp;rdquo;. This fits in with Plato&amp;rsquo;s idea of a world of &amp;ldquo;Forms&amp;rdquo; pretty well. Where basically everything we see and interact with is an imperfect clone of something perfect that exists only in this world of forms. I.E the world in which a perfect triangle exists, which for now can only be accessed by thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
