<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Neoconservatism on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/neoconservatism/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Neoconservatism on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/neoconservatism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Assassins’ Gate</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-assassins-gate-america-in-iraq/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-assassins-gate-america-in-iraq/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;ldquo;They&amp;rsquo;ve been living this way for centuries, are you really gonna change that in a year? All you can do is try.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The above words, quoted from an unlucky soldier stationed in Iraq, seem to epitomize the entire endeavor. George Packer does a brilliant job setting the stage and providing an overview of the why&amp;rsquo;s and how&amp;rsquo;s of the Iraq war.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When it comes to events as significant as war, there are seldom singular reasons that confidently explain everything. WMDs were a reason the administration gave for invading; September 11th provided the provocation for public support. Beyond that, a menagerie of motivations and political realities were aligning to push America into war.  According to Packer, George W. Bush was a principled man but not a leader with vision. As a result, when the catastrophe of 9/11 struck, he fell back on his gut instinct, which told him justice needed to be done, without adequately considering long-term consequences. Meanwhile, a parallel ideology known as neoconservatism, which had a particular vision of America&amp;rsquo;s role in the world, happened to be ascending. Thus, Bush&amp;rsquo;s gut feelings found theoretical support, providing the vision he lacked.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
