<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mythology on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/mythology/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Mythology on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/mythology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>American Gods</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/american-gods/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/american-gods/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Gods die. And when they truly die they are unmourned and unremembered. Ideas are more difficult to kill than people, but they can be killed, in the end.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A recently released prisoner named Shadow is on a return flight home when there is a mix up and his seat gets upgraded to first class. Waiting for him is a mysterious stranger with a job offer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thoughts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unsurprisingly, I really enjoyed this book. A book that almost lives up to the hype, but would have been slightly better to have stumbled on without knowing anything about it. Neil Gaiman draws out scenes and situations so vividly that they became almost scars in my memory. In the age of pictures, it is difficult to make people see with just words. That is not a problem in this book, you will see what is happening, even if sometimes you didn&amp;rsquo;t want to.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Hero With a Thousand Faces</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-hero-with-a-thousand-faces/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:32:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-hero-with-a-thousand-faces/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a phenomenon where a large group of ideas and people are looked at in the academic world with contempt as if they were below consideration. Or perhaps we have progressed past them in some way. But at every turn we see signs of their influence and general acceptance. I feel like Jung, Campbell, and especially Freud with their ideas fit neatly into this category. The influence of a hero with 1000 faces (1949) is insane. Pretty much any story you&amp;rsquo;ve ever enjoyed either implicitly follows the structure laid out by Campbell or was directly influenced by this book. From Watership Down to Jim Morrison, the Matrix, Harry Potter, Star Wars, etc. Campbell makes the claim that all of the different mythologies in the world are actually part of a monomyth which emerges from the human psyche. As such a myth in any part of the world will loosely follow a structure, which he calls the Hero&amp;rsquo;s Journey. One way of thinking about myths are that they are stories that can&amp;rsquo;t not be told. A dream is a personalized myth, and a myth is a de-personalized dream. Myths in this light are our primary link to metaphysics. After having already read the Power of Myth there won&amp;rsquo;t be much new in this book other than a more rigorous explanation of the stages of the hero&amp;rsquo;s journey. Also (my favorite part) many entertaining myths that you&amp;rsquo;ve probably never heard of. Like all work relating to myth, it is highly speculative and prone to the brain seeing patterns that do not exist. This objection must in some sense be ignored though, due to the resonance this book has had. It seems like there must be something to it even if it is just a glitch in our brains. It doesn&amp;rsquo;t matter if these ideas are ignored, they seem to seep through the cracks of our psyche anyway. For the average reader I would probably recommend just reading this or Power of Myth if you are looking for something shorter. To read both of them is probably only necessary if you are in need of a double dose of mythological pimping.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Power of Myth</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-power-of-myth/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-power-of-myth/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I love myths, so this book was really interesting in that regard. It goes well beyond the common ones that you&amp;rsquo;ve heard. Definitely made me want to read more about myths from North America. Campbell and Peterson seem like two peas in a pod although it seems like one pea (Peterson) has spent more time looking into the abyss than the other, for better or worse. This book is very staccato, an idea broached, a story told and then moved past to the next. What was at first a conversation between Campbell and Moyers was transcribed into the power of myth.  In this sense it made for a poor book seeing as a book is the best medium we have for long form thought, but a conversation unless purely one sided can never truly be long form. The silver lining was that you were able to witness a huge breadth of Campbell&amp;rsquo;s beliefs instead of a narrow but deep vein. It made for a good overview of his position so that if you ever were to read one of his books in the future you won&amp;rsquo;t be starting from scratch. The connections made in this book were very interesting and food for more research. I am especially interested in the connection of the rise and fall of goddesses and the beginning of agriculture.  Simone de Beauvoir pointed out essentially the same thing and for the similar reasons. Campbell seems places the chain of causality to be:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Epic of Gilgamesh</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-epic-of-gilgamesh/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-epic-of-gilgamesh/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is the oldest work of fiction in the history of the world. Read it! The oldest copies date around 2100BC. For reference the oldest copies of the Bible we have on hand are from the dead sea scrolls which date to 200-300 BC. That&amp;rsquo;s not to say that the dead sea scrolls are the first copies of the bible but they are the oldest we have while the rest are probably lost due to the writing material of choice, so we&amp;rsquo;ll never really know when the first copy of the Bible was written. The reason this survived for so long was that it was inscribed on a clay tablet. Going into this story I expected it to be dull. I was wrong, probably in part thanks to the particular translation I used, but on the whole this book is a must read. I think the most striking and controversial thing is that in the book there is an account of the flood. Now I know what you picture in your head when I say that, but literally when a character in the book started recounting the flood, it was totally shocking. The similarities and details couched in such exotic settings made for an incredible mind-bending experience. I won&amp;rsquo;t go over the similarities to save them for those who read. The story was then followed by an essay by the translator who explained where the text came from and how it was translated. This too was helpful to get more of an understanding of its place in history. At any rate I&amp;rsquo;d definitely put this one on your reading list.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
