<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Monarchy on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/monarchy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Monarchy on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/monarchy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Democracy in America</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/democracy-in-america/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:30:35 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/democracy-in-america/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great book to build a functional understanding of the how and why of the U.S. government. The first volume is fantastic; the second one is slightly more speculative but still full of good insights.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much has changed since the writing of the book in the 1830s, although one of de Tocqueville&amp;rsquo;s central claims—that Russia and the U.S. were destined to be world powers—has panned out quite nicely. Instead of a full review, which would be insanely long due to the length and breadth of the book, I&amp;rsquo;ll leave some scattered thoughts:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rights of Man</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/rights-of-man/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:29:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/rights-of-man/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This book was largely a response to a response to the French Revolution by Edmund Burke. The French Revolution started in 1789. The aristocracy of England was starting to see the writing on the wall and the French Revolution made them that much more uneasy. So, one of monarchy&amp;rsquo;s most vocal proponents (Edmund Burke) wrote a book entitled &amp;ldquo;Reflections on the Revolution of France&amp;rdquo;. If that book was a Facebook status a good chunk of this book was a comment on Burke&amp;rsquo;s Facebook status. Paine rips the idea of monarchy to shreds. To summarize his argument in a couple sentences I would say Paine&amp;rsquo;s main point was this: Government should be formed to protect the &lt;em&gt;existing&lt;/em&gt; rights of man and not be looked to as a &lt;em&gt;definition&lt;/em&gt; of human rights. Furthermore, that any formal document that is written in order to form a government is a limitation on those rights of man. Therefore, it should be the individuals themselves that define the contract that does so limit each man&amp;rsquo;s individual freedom. The book itself is a little rant-y hence my Facebook reference. But it would probably be one of the best, and most informed Facebook responses you will ever read. I did not realize that the French revolution was in such close proximity to our own. This makes me interested to contrast the two. One seemed very &amp;lsquo;gentlemanly&amp;rsquo; and the other seemed sort of &amp;lsquo;barbaric&amp;rsquo;. Not sure if this is due to my own ignorance or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
