<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Leo_tolstoy on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/leo_tolstoy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Leo_tolstoy on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/leo_tolstoy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>War and Peace</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/war-and-peace/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:31:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/war-and-peace/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t get paid enough to do a proper review of this book, so here&amp;rsquo;s an improper review for ya. War and Peace covers about 8 years of history from 1805-1813. This is the part of history where Napoleon invades Europe and makes it all the way to Russia, culminating in the war of 1812. It is a realist novel, as Tolstoy did an unbelievable amount of research into the war and paints an incredibly detailed picture of the invasion. The central theme of this book (to me) is history, and the way people relate to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Death of Ivan Ilych</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-death-of-ivan-ilych/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:31:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-death-of-ivan-ilych/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This book is a short story that focuses mostly on the last few days of Ivan Ilyich. Ivan is a judge in high court. Tolstoy briefly gives a bird&amp;rsquo;s eye view of his life by describing it as&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;neither as cold and formal as his elder brother nor as wild as the younger, but was a happy mean between them an intelligent, polished, lively, and agreeable man.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ivan took great pains to structure his life to be described just in that way. The Radiohead song &amp;ldquo;everything in its right place&amp;rdquo; comes to mind. Climbing the social ladder and making all his decisions based on what was most &amp;ldquo;decorous&amp;rdquo;, Ivan is struck down by an unforeseen terminal illness and spends his last days introspectively considering the life he&amp;rsquo;s lived. He feels like he doesn&amp;rsquo;t deserve sickness he has been afflicted with because he views his life as being lived well. This book articulates most people&amp;rsquo;s worst fear, which is living your entire life but only at the end of it having the clarity to see it was mostly a sham. I think everyone considers their own life. Some people more than others, but no matter how much you do consider it one thing is true. You will never be able to manufacture the clarity of the final which you will be faced with on your death bed. This book, like other Russian books, places emphasis on living truthfully. The alternative is spiritual death. This book has really funked with the headspace for which I am thankful. This book was written later in Tolstoy&amp;rsquo;s life, and many translate it as his own struggle with the reality of death which can be summed up in this quote:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Kingdom of God Is Within You</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-kingdom-of-god-is-within-you/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:31:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-kingdom-of-god-is-within-you/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Man, I don&amp;rsquo;t even know where to begin with this book. I had started this book last spring but took a break for a couple months. Even during the sabbatical, thoughts from this book would recur in my head until I eventually picked it back up about a month ago. Written towards the end of Tolstoy&amp;rsquo;s life it was banned from Russia so initially it was printed in Germany. This book comes at a very interesting point in history. About 30 years after Das Kapital, and only 20 years prior to a world war that the book predicts without intending to, but almost as an inevitability. While people were arguing and continue to argue the virtues of Communism over Capitalism or vice versa, Tolstoy presents a possible third choice&amp;hellip; neither. Tolstoy&amp;rsquo;s fundamental belief springs from the nonresistance taught in the sermon on the mount. As a result, he draws striking conclusions about governments and the people who support them. He draws a consistent line from this single doctrine to show that a government of any kind is incompatible with this belief. When I say to anti capital punishment people something like &amp;ldquo;if you are against the death penalty, then disband the army&amp;rdquo;. Tolstoy would say yes, absolutely and also defundThePolice. As such his ideas were inherently anarchistic, but in the most compelling and consistent of ways. He makes his argument that human&amp;rsquo;s moral development is in stages. The first stage is that of a savage where one only cares about themselves. The second stage is that of a citizen where one only thinks of the group they belong to (family, nation, etc.) the third and final stage is that of divinity when one cares for the entire world. Whereas this might sound cliche, he backs it up with brilliant reasons, and allegories to elaborate his thinking. It is a very interesting pairing to read this book directly after Just Mercy. The two of these books have me again questioning crime and punishment, death penalty etc. I will be thinking about points in this book for some time to come.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
