<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Joris_karl_huysmans on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/joris_karl_huysmans/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Joris_karl_huysmans on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/joris_karl_huysmans/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Against Nature</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/against-nature/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:31:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/against-nature/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is no doubt whatever that this eternally self-replicating old fool (Nature) has now exhausted the good-natured admiration of all true artists, and the moment has come to replace her, as far as that can be achieved, with artiface.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So basically, it is this whole thing. Huysmans was a novelist in the 19th century whose early works were part of the naturalistic school which sought out beauty and truth in the mundane, but later in his life this changed. He began to feel cramped and redundant inside the confines of nature and wished to supersede it through artifice. Maybe this would give us a more visceral or concentrated glimpse of beauty? Enter what is known as the &amp;ldquo;Decadent&amp;rdquo; literature. This school found its poster child in Dorian Gray, and this is how I came to hear about it. On a reread of the Picture of Dorian Gray, there was this quote:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
