<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Jordan_peterson on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/jordan_peterson/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Jordan_peterson on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/jordan_peterson/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Power of Myth</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-power-of-myth/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-power-of-myth/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I love myths, so this book was really interesting in that regard. It goes well beyond the common ones that you&amp;rsquo;ve heard. Definitely made me want to read more about myths from North America. Campbell and Peterson seem like two peas in a pod although it seems like one pea (Peterson) has spent more time looking into the abyss than the other, for better or worse. This book is very staccato, an idea broached, a story told and then moved past to the next. What was at first a conversation between Campbell and Moyers was transcribed into the power of myth.  In this sense it made for a poor book seeing as a book is the best medium we have for long form thought, but a conversation unless purely one sided can never truly be long form. The silver lining was that you were able to witness a huge breadth of Campbell&amp;rsquo;s beliefs instead of a narrow but deep vein. It made for a good overview of his position so that if you ever were to read one of his books in the future you won&amp;rsquo;t be starting from scratch. The connections made in this book were very interesting and food for more research. I am especially interested in the connection of the rise and fall of goddesses and the beginning of agriculture.  Simone de Beauvoir pointed out essentially the same thing and for the similar reasons. Campbell seems places the chain of causality to be:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
