<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Jesus_india_theory on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/jesus_india_theory/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Jesus_india_theory on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/jesus_india_theory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Naked Truth of Jesusism From Oriental Manuscripts (Classic Reprint)</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-naked-truth-of-jesusism-from-oriental-manuscripts-classic-reprint/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:35 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-naked-truth-of-jesusism-from-oriental-manuscripts-classic-reprint/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This book was complete trash. This wins the worst book I&amp;rsquo;ve read since I can remember. There weren&amp;rsquo;t any redeeming factors in this book. The author was a strong proponent of the &amp;ldquo;Jesus went to India&amp;rdquo; theory, which is literally based on one book by some random Russian dude who may or may not have gotten rich from the story. No modern-day scholars put any merit in this theory. That doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean it&amp;rsquo;s wrong necessarily, but it does mean you can get a show on the History channel if you believe in it. For some unknown reason the author tried to write the story in a sort of prose, which if you ever have heard spoken world then you know exactly the style this book was written in. The author&amp;rsquo;s views were an infusion of eastern mysticism with Marxist overtones. This by itself is great, but why not write in a normal format. Also why try to foist your views onto a 1st century Palestinian? This book would have been more convincing and enjoyable had it been written like a normal book instead of in Goodwill prose, also if he could have cited sources, for further research that would have been much appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
