<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Humanity on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/humanity/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Humanity on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/humanity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Heart of Darkness</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/heart-of-darkness/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:31:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/heart-of-darkness/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I had heard this book mentioned a couple times and so I had it on my list for a month or so and finished it in one sitting. Very entertaining, the mood was very tense. It reminded me a little of Lovecraft&amp;rsquo;s style. The story follows a captain of a steamboat for an ivory trading company that goes up a mysterious river in Africa.  The plot started to feel familiar to me about halfway through. Turns out it inspired the movie Apocalypse Now which I had just seen for the first time less than a week prior, one of those rando coincidences. So, there are many similar themes between that movie and this book. Here are some notable quotes to summarize the feeling:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Notes from the Underground</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/notes-from-the-underground/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:31:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/notes-from-the-underground/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 1864, Russia and the Western world was experiencing a philosophical reversal with reverberations that can still be felt almost two hundred years later. One by one “unquestionable” truths were being placed in the dust bin by a cold rationality. The attack on humanity’s placement of itself in the universe started over three hundred years earlier, when a polymath named Copernicus rediscovered the forgotten truth that we are not the center of the universe. Ever since then, the more scientific details that are catalogued about the world, the further man is pushed from that once prized and secure position. There are two main ideas that the underground man (UM) simultaneously seems to prove by his actions and disapprove of by his words. First is man as nature, the second is man as automata, and by extension nature as automata. It had only been five years since Charles Darwin had written ‘On the Origin of Species’ and already Dostoyevsky has incorporated his theory and worked out what he sees as its possible ramifications. Chiefly that of an alienated human that is horrified to look in the mirror and see no-thing looking back. In an opening note to the book Dostoevsky makes clear that the UM is an inevitable product of the spread of these two ideologies. The book opens with the memorable&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
