<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Founding_fathers on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/founding_fathers/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Founding_fathers on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/founding_fathers/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/thomas-jefferson-the-art-of-power/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/thomas-jefferson-the-art-of-power/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;America&amp;rsquo;s third president was a citizen of the world. An idealist in values, but ruthlessly pragmatic when in the seat of authority. Jefferson was in public service for about fifty years, with his influence lasting directly up to Jackson&amp;rsquo;s presidency, making him one of the most effective political operatives in American history. Meacham gives a full view of Jefferson&amp;rsquo;s life from early education to his end-of-life correspondence with Adams. Jefferson cuts one of the most romantic and contradictory figures in early America. To the rest of the world, he displayed a certain sophistication many thought impossible to emerge from the Americas, whereas to history his regressive stance on slavery taints his memory: he at once acknowledged its illegitimacy yet could not bring himself to reject the peculiar institution altogether. Jefferson was the most vocal of the founding fathers in his defense of the individual rights of man (though, of course, definitions of &amp;ldquo;men&amp;rdquo; varied), and this manifested in an expressed distrust of strong federal governments. The preference for small government formed the basis for his antagonism with America&amp;rsquo;s other premier intellect, Alexander Hamilton. This disagreement ended up forming the first political parties in the US, the Federalists (Hamilton&amp;rsquo;s party) and the Republicans (Jefferson&amp;rsquo;s party). The founding gets mythologized for obvious reasons, but it is truly remarkable that two such politically fertile minds as Jefferson and Hamilton would be selected to form this country&amp;rsquo;s first cabinet. It is also a testament to Washington&amp;rsquo;s leadership that such a cabinet could exist for as long as it did. Always sure that Washington was Hamilton&amp;rsquo;s puppet, Jefferson would eventually retire to Monticello in a semi-theatrical way. His avowed aim was to put the dirty work of politics behind him, but both Washington and Hamilton suspected that Jefferson was &amp;ldquo;protesting too much.&amp;rdquo; Their suspicions turned out to be correct, he would shortly be back in office, serving a single term under the acerbic John Adams as vice president. He would then deftly create the first single-term president in US history, ascending to the highest office in the land. Once in the driver&amp;rsquo;s seat, strong centralized authority seemed useful, and Jefferson did little to curtail the powers of the executive. In fact, when Napoleon offered Jefferson the Louisiana Purchase, he was worried that the purchase of lands was not within the scope of Federal authority and would require an amendment. He ended up deciding the amendment path would open the purchase up to an extended window of debate and deliberation when decisive and quick action was needed, and so he pushed the purchase straight to Congress. This is not to say that Jefferson&amp;rsquo;s values were inauthentically held; it was more a testament to his adaptability. After Jefferson served two terms, the presidential office went to his long-term friend and ideological ally Madison. He would keep in close contact with leaders of the Republican Party for the rest of his life.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Federalist Papers</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-federalist-papers/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:29:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-federalist-papers/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Federalist Papers&lt;/em&gt; are a collection of essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in support of the Constitution drafted in 1787, over a decade after the Declaration of Independence. With the benefit of hindsight, historical events and structures can often seem predetermined, obscuring the many decisions that had to be made along the way. The journey of the United States from independence to forming a federal government was not a straight path. The land won by the Revolutionary War consisted of 13 colonies, newly rebranded as &amp;ldquo;states.&amp;rdquo; Each state had adopted its own constitution shortly after rebelling against the British crown. These individual states were loosely united during the Revolutionary War under the Articles of Confederation, which defined a weak central government and functioned more like a treaty than a true organizing principle. This absence of centralized energy resulted in many inefficiencies during both war and peace. It may seem obvious now, but for the governors of these separate states, the idea of surrendering autonomy and assuming shared responsibility with neighboring states was far from intuitive. Thus, the framers faced an uphill battle in convincing all 13 states that it was in their best interest to form a federal government. This debate can be seen as an early manifestation of the enduring tension between &amp;ldquo;big government&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;small government.&amp;rdquo; Even though the federal government of that time was far more limited than it is today, it still represented a form of &amp;ldquo;big government&amp;rdquo; that had to contend with many of the same critiques leveled by libertarians today. The framers&amp;rsquo; greatest inspiration was their nearly obsessive desire to construct a government that would, by its very design, prevent the rise of a dictator. &amp;ldquo;It has been frequently remarked, that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not, of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force.&amp;rdquo; – Alexander Hamilton One of the key principles was that it should be the structure of the government itself that prevents abuse of power, not merely the laws it creates. This is why so much of &lt;em&gt;The Federalist Papers&lt;/em&gt; is devoted to discussing which responsibilities should fall to the legislative, judicial, or executive branches. It was also part of the rationale behind making the Constitution difficult to amend, as the framers hoped to limit the extent to which any bad actor could consolidate power.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
