<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Demea on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/demea/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Demea on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/demea/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/dialogues-concerning-natural-religion/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:29:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/dialogues-concerning-natural-religion/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scottish philosopher David Hume explores various approaches to theism via dialogue, featuring three central figures:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Demea&lt;/em&gt;
Demea represents pre-Enlightenment theism, which emphasized the difference between man and God. The godhead is unintelligible and must be approached by faith alone. We must make our way through this veil of tears, holding on to the belief that everything will be put to rights in the next world.
&lt;em&gt;Cleanthes&lt;/em&gt;
Cleanthes is a post-Enlightenment scientific Christian who highlights the similarities between the mind of God and human reason. To Cleanthes, man can access God, though imperfectly, through reason. When he looks at the universe, he sees a marvelous machine designed by a benevolent creator. It is the delight of man to learn more about their creator by discovering the mechanisms by which the universe operates.
&lt;em&gt;Philo&lt;/em&gt;
Philo is a theistic skeptic, whose role in the dialogue is to tease out the problems in his friends&amp;rsquo; positions. His view is closer to that of Demea but differs in conclusion, believing that it is incredibly unlikely that any human will land on a cosmology that is anywhere near the truth. Therefore, the wisest tactic would be to approach the topic with caution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
