<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Conspiracy_again_human_race on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/conspiracy_again_human_race/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Conspiracy_again_human_race on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/conspiracy_again_human_race/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Conspiracy Against the Human Race</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-conspiracy-against-the-human-race/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-conspiracy-against-the-human-race/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;At some point during a conversation, I asked a question that was half-joking and half-serious. I asked, &amp;ldquo;If life is suffering, why is it morally okay to continue bringing more life into this world?&amp;rdquo; Little did I know, I would soon read a book that asked the same question. This book, published in 2010 by Thomas Ligotti, was an explanation of his own philosophy, which happened to be extremely dark. Ligotti starts by explaining that most people have the assumption that &amp;ldquo;being alive is alright,&amp;rdquo; and it is from this assumption that most philosophy is built. Instead, Ligotti starts with the assumption that &amp;ldquo;being alive is NOT alright,&amp;rdquo; and proceeds from there. This book could be considered an agreement and expansion of Peter Zapffe&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;The Last Messiah,&amp;rdquo; in which Zapffe argues that consciousness (mostly a sense of self) is a class A blunder by evolution. Ligotti calls this level of consciousness the &amp;ldquo;Mother of All Horrors,&amp;rdquo; as it has given us the ability to realize that we are puppets, turning us into uncanny things that no longer belong in nature. Zapffe concludes that the best course of action is for humanity to implement a two-child limit, causing the gradual extinction of the human race. Ligotti and other philosophers argue that parents have blood on their hands for bringing more uncanny, absurd creatures into this world of suffering. He also points out the similarities between this worldview and Buddhism, in that the destruction of the self is the goal of both, just with different wrapping paper. Ligotti argues that many philosophers have arrived at the same conclusion that he has, but they have made a twist at the end to allow them to tell the same story differently or come to a different conclusion, which is usually the conclusion that &amp;ldquo;being alive is alright.&amp;rdquo; There was a quote near the end of the book that has really stuck with me, which captures the isolation communicated in the book. It went something like, &amp;ldquo;Humans are the only species that, if they were to instantly go extinct, would not be missed.&amp;rdquo; As a bit of trivia, this book was a primary inspiration for Matthew McConaughey&amp;rsquo;s character in the first season of True Detective. Overall, this book was difficult to read due to how dark it was. The writing was quite good, but it was the definition of defeatist. It has given me much to think about.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
