<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Cambrian_explosion on George&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/cambrian_explosion/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Cambrian_explosion on George&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.georgefabish.com/tags/cambrian_explosion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Cosmic Serpent</title>
      <link>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-cosmic-serpent-dna-and-the-origins-of-knowledge/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:33:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.georgefabish.com/reviews/the-cosmic-serpent-dna-and-the-origins-of-knowledge/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This book was a wild ride like watching some guy on the history channel talk about something that you have no clue about. Could be classy&amp;hellip;. could be demonic, but either way entertaining! I found his points about the complexity of DNA and the stability of animal archetypes after the Cambrian explosion to be quite interesting and something that I will have to keep an eye out for in the future. Big bang debunked?! But seriously, I think we should be able to hold Darwinism as loosely as we hold Mormonism. If something else comes along and replaces it, all the better! I thought the book raised a lot of good questions and gave some pretty shaky answers, not that I have any better theories to sally forth, I shall sit back and let someone braver face the ridicule of the scientific world. As Planck&amp;rsquo;s principle says, &amp;ldquo;Science progresses one funeral at a time&amp;rdquo;. Perhaps our conceptions of soup to cell, needs a snake!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
